Asus X555LJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555LJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LJ
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 09:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 158
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 248
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Asus(1043 1A6D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 9.06
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 7.35
6% 6.62 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 100 99 100 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 428
Write 390
Mixed 300
SusWrite 142
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 36.7
136% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 211
186% 276 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 100%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
724GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 80 79 80 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 80.1
Write 67.7
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 79.1
84% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
13FE silicon-power 32GB
26GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 150
Write 84.4
Mixed 63
112% 99 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
78% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Kingston 9905469-157.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LJ Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback