Acer Aspire M3900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 22:33
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 70.4
41% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 130
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 14.8
14% 16.8 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 18.6
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 65 63 72 76 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 246
Write 91.5
Mixed 129
SusWrite 57.4
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 23.4
95% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 95
81% 122 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 89%
HGST HTS 541075A9E680 750GB
440GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 23 27 28 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 28.3
Mixed 27
SusWrite 26.1
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 02FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3900 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback