Today's hottest deals

Asus N73SV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus N73SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N73SV
Memory6.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 29 '20 at 00:11
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 372
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 15E2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS54755 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: A60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 74 76 75 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 82.4
Write 83.3
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 74.8
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 53 49 62 72 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 57.6
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 859B CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N73SV Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N73SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback