Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 04:28
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 118
54% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 142
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS54755 500GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 43 51 39 58 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 3
Write 1.8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 43.7
9% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Micron 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback