MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 12:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 922
84% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,289
80% 1,289 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 117
Parallax 101
87% 108 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB1.1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 114 465 105 123 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 706
Write 750
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 181
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 42.3
108% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 315
277% 402 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
732GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 144 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 101
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 144
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 114%
TDKMedia Gold Flash 8GB
2GB free, PID 048a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.7 2.9 2.7 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 8.5
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 2.6
12% 9.67 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 7%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
9GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 3.5 6.3 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5
7% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 33.1
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 29.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback