Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i3SYB
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 22:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 104
46% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 168
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 2063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7529
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 7.35
Parallax 6.47
4% 6.32 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 12
8% 8.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 311 322 318 319 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 721
Mixed 446
SusWrite 345
135% 607 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 32.2
110% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 394
246% 262 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 101%
Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8200
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 43.1
Mixed 22.3
25% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 18 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.61% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 18
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 20.3
24% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.61%
Great: 19%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
738GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 137 140 140 138 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 116
Write 83.7
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 133
131% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback