Acer Aspire VN7-792G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-792G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire VN7-792G
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 14:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 98
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 344
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 103A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 5.09
4% 8.83 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 11.3
7% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 69 69 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 90.8
Write 99.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 71.1
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 64%
518GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 34.9
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 20.2
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 52%
Lexar JumpDrive Triton USB 3.0 16GB-$60
9GB free, PID a203
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 32.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 20.7
35% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire VN7-792G Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 56%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-792G

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback