Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Memory 34.3 1-Core 14 2-Core 23.7 17% 24 Pts	4-Core 34.1 8-Core 34.8 5% 34.4 Pts	64-Core 34.1 2% 34.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 051C) 1.2GB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2342 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.94 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXF 500GB 2,703 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: GV108B SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 64 63 62 66 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 62.9 Write 64.2 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 62.3 38% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80 M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 286 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 5.4 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	17x

SSD
NEO N400 SSD 120GBKlevvBench 65%, 486 samples	1x
Ultimate SU800 128GBAdata $30Bench 77%, 32,167 samples	1x
120GB 120GBQnixBench 58%, 73 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	2x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBAD80Bench 22%, 601 samples	1x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GBNanyaBench 17%, 1,374 samples	1x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $130