Today's hottest deals

Positivo MOBILE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo MOBILE  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO A14HV0A
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime8 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 17:49
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 99.4
51% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 136
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXF 500GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GV108B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 20 12 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 18.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 22.7
15% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.B346G.C280C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MOBILE Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo MOBILE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback