PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181102 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '20 at 04:07 |
Run Duration | 243 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,579
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
159%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 423 400 410 390 401 MB/s
|
97.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
593GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 418 399 406 381 391 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
146GB free
Firmware: 3.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 90 92 89 92 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
SABRENT 500GB
389GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 136 140 136 140 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
SABRENT 320GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0204
|
||||
Patriot Memory 248GB
119GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 28 32 33 29 34 MB/s
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT 2115 1TB
329GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT 2115 3TB
233GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 15 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT 2115 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
7.65%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.8%
Excellent
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 498x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 262x |
Core i7-7740XIntel $234Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 150x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 170x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 152x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $791 |