Acer Aspire E1-570

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-570  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_CX
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 10:59
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 96.8
49% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 123
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0835) 775MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3234
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 2.59
3% 3.66 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.57
4% 4.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 61 76 74 78 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 17.5
Write 75.4
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 73.3
34% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 61%
USBModem Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.7 4.1 4 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.48% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 2
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4
6% 4.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.2
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC2P1-B1FS 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-570 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback