Today's hottest deals

Asus X202E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X202E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X202E
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 12 '22 at 23:32
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 85.8
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 76.5
48% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 118
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 108D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 62 63 52 52 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40% Average
Read 83.1
Write 80.5
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 56.4
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40%
Great: 61%
SDHC Card 32GB
17GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 16 16 15 16 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
7.57% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 10.2
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 14.3
18% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.57%
Great: 22%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 11 7.8 9.6 7.1 8.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 8.6
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X202E Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X202E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback