Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory29.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151104
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 01:45
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 147
52% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 579
53% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,501
93% 1,501 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 377E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 151
Parallax 136
109% 140 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 140
Splatting 112
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 505 602 605 607 584 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 558
Mixed 350
SusWrite 559
97% 425 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 42.1
153% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 583
440% 590 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 117%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
690GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 398 464 468 470 469 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 449
Mixed 418
SusWrite 439
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 55.3
175% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 340
255% 340 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 124GB
115GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 28 29 26 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 40
Mixed 31
SusWrite 25.8
46% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2
174% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 93%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 128GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 7.3 5.5 5.1 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 6.5
39% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.4
295% 5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -3 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6.5 4.3 5.3 5.2 8.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.1% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 40
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 6.1
39% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.3
82% 2.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 13.1
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $644
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback