Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 100% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '20 at 17:10
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 243 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 918 84% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,327 82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 129 Parallax 143 115% 138 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 127 Splatting 107 110% 138 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB 922 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 712 512 468 513 406 398 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 774 Write 576 Mixed 974 SusWrite 501 159% 706 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 36.7 124% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 478 DQ Write 639 DQ Mixed 546 416% 554 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 221%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG MZ1LV960 960GB 236GB free Firmware: BXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 131 110 96 84 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.6% Good	Read 301 Write 349 Mixed 295 SusWrite 117 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 32.2 118% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 193 157% 215 MB/s

Toshiba THNSNJ1T02CSX 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 296GB free Firmware: JXPS4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 302 348 350 352 353 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 370 Write 338 Mixed 313 SusWrite 334 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 35.4 120% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 206 155% 210 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 106%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB 1,420 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 11GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Read 30.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 3.3 11% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 37% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 19%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 935GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.8 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 25.5 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 9.7 31% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 21%
ST1000DM 000-9TS15E 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 250GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 8.7 9.1 9.3 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 24.7 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 8.9 28% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.4% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 18.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 18.3 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)