Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '20 at 09:26
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 131 2-Core 254 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 736 78% 624 Pts	64-Core 730 45% 730 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 2543) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	71.8% Very good	Lighting 95 Reflection 85.7 Parallax 77.5 77% 86.1 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 78.1 Splatting 73.4 61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 2 116 83 122 119 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 416 Write 335 Mixed 239 SusWrite 122 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 10.2 64% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 77.1 DQ Write 87.6 DQ Mixed 33.3 39% 66 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 55%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 178 179 181 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 208 Write 186 Mixed 103 SusWrite 179 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 0.7 10% 4.1 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 11.2 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 23%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 147GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 147 148 148 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 165 Write 159 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 147 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 109%
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB 2,518 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 88GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 52 Write 54.9 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 57.3 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ZION-8GBDDR4PC2400 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 22.7 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	399x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	382x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	297x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	196x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	129x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	167x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	52x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	44x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359