Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 686
75% 596 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.4% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 80.4
76% 85.3 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 73
60% 73.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 136 119 139 143 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 366
Mixed 311
SusWrite 147
236% 318 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 12.4
2,275% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 173%
Great: 160%
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
111GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 52 52 53 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 58.7
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 51.5
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
98GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 166 166 166 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 162
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ZION-8GBDDR4PC2400 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.4
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback