Today's hottest deals

Sirona MS-7522

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSirona MS-7522  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)
Memory11.4 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 19:57
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 161
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 391
37% 308 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 2059) 2GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 9.88
10% 11.7 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 16
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$42
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 25 394 225 225 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
751GB free
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 108 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 97
Write 98.9
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 110
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 112%
WD WD200EB-00BHF0 20GB
18GB free
Firmware: 15.15M15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 24.6
Mixed 16.1
SusWrite 24
16% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 20%
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
21GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 20.7
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 17.3
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 17.7
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 13.1
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
76% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7522 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Sirona MS-7522

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback