Today's hottest deals

Samsung 940X5N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 940X5N  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP940X5N-X01US
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181123
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 17:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 562
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Sanyo(144D C162) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.19
7% 9.39 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 16.5
10% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTD128HAGM-000KN 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T882004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 179 165 225 232 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 422
Write 394
Mixed 353
SusWrite 197
255% 342 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 43.1
7,540% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 143
1,850% 264 MB/s
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
132GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 30.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 32.5
41% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 940X5N Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 940X5N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback