Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 67.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 296
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 977
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,363
84% 1,363 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 99.2
Parallax 211
108% 148 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 147
Splatting 143
109% 131 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,786
Write 1,438
Mixed 918
305% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.7
220% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 881
688% 943 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 294%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
44GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 349
Mixed 310
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 23.8
81% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 149
124% 180 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
18GB free
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 169 163 171 154 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 329
Write 210
Mixed 242
SusWrite 167
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 25
86% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 198
152% 209 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 88%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
227GB free
Firmware: AADA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,546
Write 849
Mixed 718
228% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 42.2
153% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 788
583% 756 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 251%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
41GB free
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 301
Mixed 268
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 35.6
129% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 168
134% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 102%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
22GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.8
Write 80
Mixed 59.3
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
160GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.2
Write 102
Mixed 68.3
58% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
82GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,960
Write 8
Mixed 16.5
1,320% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 587
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.4
2,243% 196 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 33%
ST320LT0 07-9ZV142 320GB
21GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 45 53 53 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Below average
Read 112
Write 80
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 51.1
93% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 43%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B2 640GB
360GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 46 54 53 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 51.7
109% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 9905678-012.A00G Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.5% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 24.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $900
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback