Asus STRIX Z270G GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 20:03
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$49
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 578
77% 578 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 3413) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 97.2
57% 78.8 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 56.4
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 261
Write 91
Mixed 152
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 30.7
129% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 132
104% 144 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
29GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 62 32 72 59 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 485
Write 327
Mixed 100
SusWrite 78.7
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 40.9
139% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 173
133% 187 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76%
Great: 82%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
26GB free
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 170 160 158 162 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 352
Write 211
Mixed 235
SusWrite 172
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 43.4
172% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 199
164% 236 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
46GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 94 92 91 97 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 77.7
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 96.9
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52%
Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
105GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,682
Write 55.7
Mixed 65
1,384% 1,934 MB/s
4K Read 882
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
36,937% 295 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$44
248GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 126 124 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 56.8
Write 89.5
Mixed 55
SusWrite 124
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
202% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 90%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60M2NA0 1TB
237GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 109 111 109 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 182
Write 176
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 108
183% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%
ST320LT0 07-9ZV142 320GB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 109 111 110 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 111
Write 94
Mixed 61
SusWrite 108
124% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 9905678-012.A00G KHX2133C14D4/4G 9905678-012.A00G 24GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.7% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270G GAMING Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270G GAMING - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $813
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback