Dell PowerEdge R610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory120GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 120GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R610
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R610  (all builds)
Memory116.6 GB free of 120 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 13:56
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 128
49% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 466
42% 354 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 73GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 32 25 26 31 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 121
Write 87.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 26
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.6
302% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 66%
Dell PERC 6/i 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 39 25 26 39 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 112%
Dell PERC 6/i 1TB
698GB free
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 39 25 26 40 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9.9 10 10 9.6 9.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
Read 98.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 9.6
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 10 9.6 10 10 9.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
Read 103
Write 12
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 9.7
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.47 MB/s
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
51GB free
Firmware: 1B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 17 16 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 79.5
Write 29.2
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 15.4
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 60%
HP EG1200FCVBQ 1TB
13GB free
Firmware: HPD6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 1.7 0.2 1.6 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Write 37
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 2.3
10% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Seagate ST2000NMCLAR2000 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: PS10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 21 22 24 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 153
Write 41.8
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 20.9
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000NMCLAR2000 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: PS10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 21 21 23 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
Read 146
Write 41.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 20.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.77 MB/s
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2.7
4% 3.52 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5173DZD-CF8 00AD009780AD HMT151R7AFP8C-G7 00AD009780AD HMT151R7BFR8C-G7 00AD00B380AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 00AD00B380AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 00AD00B380AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 00AD009780AD HMT151R7AFP8C-G7 00AD009780AD HMT151R7AFP8C-G7... 120GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 20.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R610 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback