QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 389
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 41.6
28% 35.9 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 35.6
26% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 34GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3024
Write 2,683
Mixed 1,606
540% 2,438 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 37.7
150% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 430
361% 523 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback