Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 38.5 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 127 43% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 398 38% 316 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MED1OWX 256GB 637 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1331.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 278 250 232 216 211 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 331 Write 315 Mixed 319 SusWrite 247 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 47.8 158% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 259 216% 314 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 180%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABD200 2TB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 140 140 140 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 137 Write 133 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 136 147% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.4 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9.5 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 209 19% 209 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	1x

SSD
MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 119%, 2,446 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16