Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 19:03
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 152
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 319
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.8% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 69
Parallax 65.7
54% 67.1 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 65.2
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 115 89 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 359
Write 158
Mixed 194
SusWrite 106
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 11.8
68% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 29.1
46% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 72%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
89GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 203 204 206 207 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 208
Write 207
Mixed 204
SusWrite 203
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 31.3
99% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 129%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
437GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 90.2
Write 82.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 79.5
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
116GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 110 108 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 110
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 04EF Team-Elite-1333 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback