Medion E4010 2404

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion E4010 2404 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION D3F3-EM
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '19 at 04:41
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 97.3 46% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 174 21% 161 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Elitegroup(1019 9A18) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 8 Parallax 9.34 6% 8.18 fps	MRender 7.19 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 9 6% 7.76 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 245 238 234 229 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 434 Write 288 Mixed 268 SusWrite 240 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 19.5 87% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 227 171% 229 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 60GB free Firmware: X211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 22 22 22 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.4% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 32.4 Mixed 32 SusWrite 21.4 7% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 7.6 32% 9.87 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 24.5 18% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 259GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 103 105 105 106 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 98.3 Write 107 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 105 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 88%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 96GB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 15 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Read 27.9 Write 25.4 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 15.1 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BA186D-8FAE 2x2GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 15.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 10 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16