Supermicro X6DVL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X6DVL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X6DVL
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050329
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 03 '16 at 06:06
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 44.5
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 43.8
25% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 65.9
8-Core 67.7
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 68.8
4% 68.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 90
Write 60
Mixed 67.3
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 6.32
4K Mixed 0.39
189% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 85.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 37.2
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.44
89% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 73.9
Write 44.2
Mixed 34
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 6.67
4K Mixed 0.49
200% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 114%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 84.3
Write 59
Mixed 66.4
53% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.34
124% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 84.7
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.72
4K Mixed 0.36
138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 55.9
Mixed 15.9
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.42
99% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.01% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback