Gateway SX2800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGateway SX2800  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway WG43M
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090526
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 21:17
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 69.4
39% 58 Pts
4-Core 70.1
8-Core 70.5
9% 70.3 Pts
64-Core 70.4
4% 70.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Sapphire(174B 2180) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.38 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 91 91 86 85 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 93.3
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 86.1
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 500GB
163GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 24.1
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 13.8
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12%
Great: 41%
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
75GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 27.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 13.7
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 26%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
752GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 29.1
Write 27.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 14.2
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX2800 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway SX2800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback