PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Packard ixtreme M5860 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Packard ixtreme M5860 |
Memory | 6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110809 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '19 at 15:41 |
Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 185 147 148 135 147 MB/s
|
91.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
LDLC 240GB
21GB free
Firmware: R0529A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 38 39 45 42 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
199GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 361 419 423 413 424 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
736GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 159 164 165 166 165 MB/s
|
97.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
PLATINUM My Drive 2.5'' 1TB
178GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 22 24 22 24 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
53GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 8.4 13 8.4 13 MB/s
|
9.58%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 48x |
Core i5-2320Intel $142Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 7x |
Core i5-2400Intel $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples | 13x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $173 |