Today's hottest deals

Packard ixtreme M5860

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5860  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard ixtreme M5860
Memory6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 150
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 299
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 58.8
48% 61.4 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 58.7
Splatting 53.4
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 185 147 148 135 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 470
Mixed 354
SusWrite 168
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 45.3
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 327
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 115%
LDLC 240GB
21GB free
Firmware: R0529A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 38 39 45 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 262
Write 48.8
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 45.4
21% 97 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 2.5
75% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 27.3
41% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 123%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
199GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 361 419 423 413 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 431
Mixed 274
SusWrite 380
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 32.6
107% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 201
185% 286 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
736GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 159 164 165 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 148
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 158
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 114%
PLATINUM My Drive 2.5'' 1TB
178GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 22 24 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 27
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 22.6
33% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 45%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
53GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 8.4 13 8.4 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 16.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 11.3
24% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
70% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5860 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback