bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 07:00
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 86.5
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 114
57% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 160
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2017) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 226 226 227 231 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 244
Write 217
Mixed 217
SusWrite 226
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 20.7
88% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 44.7
70% 131 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 68 68 76 100 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 66.2
Write 74.5
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 78.4
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 88%
ZTE USB Storage FFFE 16GB
1GB free, PID fff5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.1 2.1 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.52% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 1.3
2% 1.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback