| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900M (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180301 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 04 '20 at 16:21 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | BIH-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
|
35.2%
Below average
|
30% 41.7 Pts
|
10% 72.2 Pts
|
4% 69.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
|
0.77%
Terrible
|
1% 0.97 fps
|
1% 1.23 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 83 84 88 86 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
59% 79.7 MB/s
|
154% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.1%
Very poor
|
17% 5.83 GB/s
|
10% 3.47 GB/s
|
30% 132 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 202 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples | 131x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $25 |