Today's hottest deals

Huanan X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardHuanan X79  (all builds)
Memory35.8 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 16:13
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 475
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 71
Parallax 61
58% 67.8 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 71.9
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D3-120 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T161118b
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 383
Write 155
Mixed 205
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 19.1
81% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 72.4
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 58
59% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 71%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
42GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 61
Write 63.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 102
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
196GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 91 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.3
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 90.2
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
285GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 48 47 43 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
Read 98
Write 97.2
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 47.1
99% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 30%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
106GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 49 48 46 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 86.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 44.8
92% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
58GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 39 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 45
Write 84.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 39.9
74% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
240GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 39 43 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 99.5
Write 104
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 40.7
97% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
29GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.61% Terrible
Read 25
Write 13.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 12.7
23% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.4
77% 2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.61%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70EMB- M393B5170EH1- M393B5170EH1- M393B5170EH1- 43GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
32767, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.1% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huanan X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback