Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 21:45
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5472
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 86.3
43% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 301
28% 236 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 28
Parallax 29.5
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 31.3
23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 91 43 52 43 9.2 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 257
Write 199
Mixed 206
SusWrite 70.6
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 21.6
96% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 120
106% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 85%
0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 27.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 5.1
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 93%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
174GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 72.5
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 76.9
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 63%
1 500GB
144GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 33
Write 27
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 5.1
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
115GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 106 105 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 84.2
Mixed 56
SusWrite 106
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
90GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 134
Write 129
Mixed 67
SusWrite 90.5
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 76%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
38GB free
Firmware: 3B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 72
Write 71.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 68.5
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 64%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
87GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 87.5
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 76%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B0 1TB
454GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 1.1
26% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 30%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
260GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 35
Write 26
Mixed 26
SusWrite 8.4
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 45%
WDC WD75 01AALS-00J7B0 750GB
109GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 34
Write 25
Mixed 26.8
35% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
WDC WD15 EARX-22PASB0 1.5TB
183GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.15% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 0
22% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00G9B1 500GB
77GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 31
Write 25.5
Mixed 20.5
32% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
63GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.3% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 8.4
30% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 30%
WDC WD50 02ABYS-01B1B0 500GB
45GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 34.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 26.8
36% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.3 MB/s
WDC WD50 01AALS-00L3B2 500GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 34
Write 25
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 1.1
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.23 MB/s
Hitachi HTS54757 750GB
69GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Read 27.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 9.4
28% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback