Acer Aspire 4736Z

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire 4736Z (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire 4736Z
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20091201
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4400-$110 7,903 User benchmarks, average bench 34% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 37 32% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 41.1 8-Core 46.2 6% 43.7 Pts	64-Core 59.1 4% 59.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0260) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.36 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk U100 32GB 373 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.02.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 73 78 74 75 76 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.3% Very poor	Read 137 Write 78.8 Mixed 64 SusWrite 71.3 20% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 6.1 24% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 41%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB 456 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1625 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.8 1% 0.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1613 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	0.3% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.5 1% 0.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.3% Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.2 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	5.13% Terrible	Read 26 Write 4.5 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 3.2 10% 10 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.13% Great: 8%
Memory Stick Card 2GB 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.8 5.2 5.3 4.9 5.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.13% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5 8% 6.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s

Kingmax USB2.0 FlashDisk 8GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6998 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.8 5.3 6.1 5.3 5.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	2.42% Terrible	Read 6.8 Write 1.8 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 5.4 5% 3.93 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.42% Great: 5%
Kingston DT 101 II 4GB 873 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1625 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 0.5 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 1% 0.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
SDHC Card 8GB 4,464 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 13 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 19 Write 17.3 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 13.5 23% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.7 111% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire 4736Z Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4736Z

CPU
Pentium T4400Intel $110Bench 34%, 7,903 samples	10x
Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples	5x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	4x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	17x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	7x
GeForce G105MNvidiaBench 1%, 2,411 samples	2x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
120GB 120GBMidasforceBench 63%, 636 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	5x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16