| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision T1650 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T1650 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 10.8 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 19 '19 at 21:35 |
| Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.4%
Good
|
69% 119 Pts
|
44% 337 Pts
|
20% 321 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
27% 38.6 fps
|
33% 41.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 125 99 97 129 69 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
47% 213 MB/s
|
40% 17.6 MB/s
|
66% 114 MB/s
|
|
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
12TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 331 359 362 334 361 MB/s
|
||||
|
H/W RAID 0 (Striping) 8TB
306GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 16 21 20 20 MB/s
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
38% 32.5 MB/s
|
33% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F7251U64F9333G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.8%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
52% 76.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 952 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 309x |
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 148x |
| Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 81x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 74x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |