Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3V-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte B250M-D3V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-D3V-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170425
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 17:59
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$119
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 456
58% 441 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.9
33% 37.1 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 37.2
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 294 296 298 298 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 406
Write 392
Mixed 361
SusWrite 309
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 34.3
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 109
82% 109 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 126%
Toshiba THNSN8960PCSE 960GB
494GB free
Firmware: 8EET
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 406 404 419 426 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 284
Write 436
Mixed 360
SusWrite 411
85% 373 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 33.8
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 112
84% 112 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
302GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 75 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 130
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 75.3
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00A0RT0 500GB
45GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 30
Write 17.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 18.5
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 32%
WDC WD10 JFCX-68N6GN0 1TB
151GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 33.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 36.2
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MK8032GAX 80GB
66GB free, PID 2507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 26.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 16.8
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-D3V-CF Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback