Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 116 36% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 141 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Virtual HD 322GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 13 14 12 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 52.3 Write 33 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 14.6 23% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 104%
Virtual HD 859GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 463GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 12 13 12 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 61.5 Write 27.7 Mixed 50 SusWrite 13.9 29% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 64 slots used 2GB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 19.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325