Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory12.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 13:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 133
54% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 374
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 18FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 23
Parallax 5.69
5% 11.4 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.04 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 286 290 280 271 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 320
Write 294
Mixed 293
SusWrite 280
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 24.8
77% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 223
190% 279 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 126%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 95 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 49.7
Write 55
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 93.4
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 72%
WD G HD322 External 320GB
86GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 22
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 35.8
41% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback