Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GM
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 12:47
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 228
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 497
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B9E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 6.19
5% 28.3 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 12.9
8% 9.26 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 199 210 220 211 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 635
Write 667
Mixed 572
SusWrite 239
119% 528 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 30.7
103% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 561
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 500
382% 519 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 141%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
119GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 64 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 99.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 63.5
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 24.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback