Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 06:22
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$84
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 489
55% 430 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E880) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 3.84
5% 6.28 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 8.43
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 5%
Nvidia GeForce 6600 GT
Device(107D 2005) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.908
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.73
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 181
Mixed 176
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.47
138% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 184%
HTS54108 0G9AT00 80GB
17GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 13.4
Mixed 23.6
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.19
40% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-171.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback