Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$287 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 150 2-Core 305 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 1,177 102% 873 Pts	64-Core 1,662 103% 1,662 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 30 28% 29.5 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 31.3 Splatting 30.3 26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 399 397 411 412 404 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 422 Mixed 358 SusWrite 411 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 32.4 102% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 236 209% 315 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 126%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 223GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 116 117 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 106 Write 108 Mixed 29 SusWrite 116 65% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 268GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 118 117 118 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 118 Write 109 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 118 64% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 202GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 115 115 115 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 190 Write 185 Mixed 31 SusWrite 115 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 0GB free Firmware: CC24 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 154 Write 128 Mixed 84 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 9GB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 96 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 89 Write 59.8 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 95.2 58% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 114%
SEAGATE ST68022CF 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 06c1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9 9 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 9 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 9.1 12% 8.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 19 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.6 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 57.1 70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $245Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	110x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	91x
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	27x
RTX 2080Nvidia $383Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	25x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	24x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	18x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	26x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 27,641 samples	14x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $591

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16