Asus G20AJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G20AJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20AJ
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 01:09
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 518
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 85E9) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 29
Parallax 32.1
23% 29.8 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 33
Splatting 28.8
26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 300GB-$289
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 148 144 136 134 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 136
Write 199
Mixed 178
SusWrite 145
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 21.7
74% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 66.8
59% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
576GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 138 138 139 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 137
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
292GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 0.3
3% 2.17 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
374GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 19.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.6
9% 6.08 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 37%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB
887GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 43 43 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 99
Write 104
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 43.2
104% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 42%
Apricorn 1TB
566GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 212 214 212 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 207
Mixed 196
SusWrite 211
285% 211 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 19.6
1,536% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 24.9
2,216% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 156%
Great: 156%
MB4000GC WDC 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.5% Below average
Read 164
Write 42.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 43.7
84% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1 MB/s
SEAGATE ST4000NM0033 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
Read 145
Write 42
Mixed 50
SusWrite 2.6
62% 60 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20AJ Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20AJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback