HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180129
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 13:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700-$305
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.5% Very good
1-Core 121
2-Core 234
84% 178 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 611
66% 511 Pts
64-Core 628
42% 628 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 60.4
16% 55.5 fps
MRender 49.6
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 36.1
16% 50.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 467 466 463 458 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,672
Write 1,333
Mixed 807
SusWrite 497
240% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 71.8
239% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 950
713% 954 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 214%
Great: 258%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$24
5GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 37 38 34 31 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 32.6
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 2.6
258% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
75.1% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 1,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback