Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 243%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 12:04
Run Duration375 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-12900K-$589
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 193
2-Core 383
121% 222 Pts
4-Core 755
8-Core 1425
135% 1,090 Pts
64-Core 2,941
197% 2,941 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,080
Nvidia(10DE 1454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 5375 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
180% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 231
Parallax 219
180% 224 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 222
Splatting 186
179% 210 fps
Poor: 197%
This bench: 180%
Great: 259%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 1002 995 975 998 978 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,600
Write 2,388
Mixed 2,334
SusWrite 1,048
469% 2,092 MB/s
4K Read 81.7
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 123
405% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 2072
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 1713
1,215% 1,574 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 361%
Great: 410%
Crucial M500 480GB-$50
447GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 410 413 410 414 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 414
Mixed 326
SusWrite 412
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 36.5
142% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 184
174% 271 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung MZFLW512HMJP-000MV 512GB
426GB free
Firmware: CXY74M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 634 633 634 632 630 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,316
Write 635
Mixed 456
SusWrite 633
168% 760 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 50.6
228% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 954
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 538
472% 711 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 195%
Great: 151%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
252GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1617 1387 1359 1395 1399 1379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 2,338
Mixed 1,917
SusWrite 1,422
460% 2,050 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 104
358% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 2,224
DQ Write 1,819
DQ Mixed 1,942
1,476% 1,995 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 388%
Great: 410%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
859GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 412 410 409 410 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 404
Write 397
Mixed 380
SusWrite 410
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 29.2
94% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 118
98% 140 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABC150 1.5TB
459GB free
Firmware: AQ001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 48 50 44 38 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 62.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 45.2
36% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 175 180 177 173 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 112
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 175
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 99%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$75
413GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 136 145 144 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 59
SusWrite 138
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA2001 2TB
62GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 134 90 90 99 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 84.3
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 109
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
10GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 47 47 44 46 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 235
Write 45.7
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 44.4
89% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 8.5
718% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.4
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 8.6
668% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 35.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 30
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 4,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 260%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 313%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $291

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $400Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $54SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback