Lenovo 7829DB2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 7829DB2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 7829DB2
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 08:29
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 73.7
45% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 161
15% 126 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DD) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.6
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
64gb SATA Flash Drive 64GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFDN0A3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 43 42 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Ex 32GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 17 18 17 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 17.6
30% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
6GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 29.2
Write 24
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 17.9
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 4.2
378% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3150ED58E8W1600 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7829DB2 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7829DB2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback