Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 179 75% 125 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 435 43% 351 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.46 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.9 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 25.6 14% 28.4 fps	MRender 9.24 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 47 26% 29.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 52%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1391) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7000 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 7.28 5% 18.8 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 13.6 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 713GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1309 1282 1304 1263 511 512 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	199% Outstanding	Read 1,204 Write 1,093 Mixed 912 SusWrite 1,030 238% 1,060 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 56.4 191% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 655 DQ Write 622 DQ Mixed 270 304% 516 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 295%
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$173 1,585 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 430GB free Firmware: N1114B SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 413 416 422 392 397 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 428 Write 372 Mixed 283 SusWrite 408 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 29 105% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 193 162% 233 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 105%
WD Elements 1TB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 544GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 16 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 35.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 17.2 21% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 68%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 119GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 28.8 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 14.2 33% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 29%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 8GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.5 11 12 12 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 10 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 10.6 21% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.4 157% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB 28,425 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 22.1 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 23 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	733x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	636x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	200x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16