Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 98 2-Core 194 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 486 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.8% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 63.2 49% 62.9 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 57.7 Splatting 52 48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 128GB 1,759 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM03D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 382 385 383 366 386 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 475 Write 314 Mixed 253 SusWrite 371 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 29.3 103% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 95.6 123% 223 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 842GB free Firmware: NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 144 143 149 143 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 144 Write 141 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 145 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 83%
Kingston DT microDuo 64GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 58GB free, PID 16a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	7.23% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 6 Mixed 14 SusWrite 12.2 17% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.23% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 17.5 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	151x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	173x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345