PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3610 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141121 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 06 '23 at 06:36 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
65.3%
Good
|
65% 113 Pts
|
50% 404 Pts
|
30% 491 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.6%
Below average
|
34% 55.6 fps
|
40% 49.3 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() SanDisk X210 256GB-$200
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X210400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 285 301 312 368 374 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
57% 254 MB/s
|
57% 20.4 MB/s
|
112% 171 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
141GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 106 104 104 101 MB/s
|
78.4%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
166% 1.03 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
191GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 67 68 67 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
46% 62.8 MB/s
|
167% 1.47 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB 32GB
1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
|
35.4%
Below average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
23% 7.97 GB/s
|
25% 162 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 65 | 52 | 60 | 24" | 1280 720 | DELA07F DELL P2212H |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 951x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 568x |
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples | 251x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 240x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 220x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $373 |