Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 09:19
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 108
52% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 301
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 64.4
58% 69.7 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 69.1
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 39 18 27 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 347
Write 241
Mixed 209
SusWrite 34.3
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 13.5
50% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 21.2
16% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 53%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
217GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 42 18 28 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 59.7
Write 56
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 35.4
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
483GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 131 126 126 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 146
Write 130
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 127
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
329GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 132 126 126 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 127
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
548GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 154 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 144
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 154
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 CMZ16GX3M4A2133C11 CMZ16GX3M4A2133C11 CMZ16GX3M4A2133C11 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback