Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 00:51
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 195
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 408
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.7% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 107
Parallax 101
79% 102 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 98.2
79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 75GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,816
Write 1,752
Mixed 2,406
1,756% 2,325 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 47.1
8,171% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 173
1,620% 180 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 92%
Red Hat VirtIO 966GB
323GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 164 159 171 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 170
Mixed 82
SusWrite 171
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 100%
Red Hat VirtIO 17GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 428
Write 379
Mixed 261
265% 356 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 21.5
3,787% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 160
1,571% 184 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 36.7
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback