Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.1 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 02:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 302
83% 160 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 601
76% 579 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 46 74 59 64 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
217% Outstanding
MC Read 164
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 61
254% 89.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 217%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback